Proportional representation unconstitutional

Prince George-Mackenzie MLA Mike Morris on past ruling that he says shows unconstitutionality.

Over the past several months I have read and listened to countless opinions from the proponents for and against proportional representation – but not once have I seen anyone comment on whether proportional representation is a form of electoral process permitted under Canada’s Constitution.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is entrenched in the Constitution Act 1982. Section 3 of the Charter states “Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote an election of members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein.” It does not say political parties get to decide who will sit in the legislature.

The first in-depth analysis of Section 3 took place in British Columbia in a 1989 BC Court of Appeal decision on whether the Charter applied to electoral boundaries established under the British Columbia Constitution Act. For those who may not remember, B.C. had a hodge-podge arrangement of dual member ridings mixed with single member ridings and electoral populations that deviated by 70 percent or more. The court determined sections of the BC Constitution Act pertaining to electoral boundaries were unconstitutional. The direction from the court resulted in the creation of the British Columbia Boundaries Commission Act, and the regular adjustment of electoral boundaries to ensure that equality of voting power was protected. The court directed the Province to ensure that representation by population was a key determinant, allowing the province a plus or minus 25 per cent variance based on supportable regional and geographic differences.

The court, in that 1989 decision recognized 10 core values that collectively, guarantee our right to vote under Section 3.

1. The right not to, be denied the franchise on the grounds of race, sex, educational qualification or other unjustifiable criteria;

2. The right to be presented with a choice of candidates;

3. The right to a secret ballot;

4. The right to have one’s vote counted;

5. The right to have one’s vote count for the same as other valid votes cast in a district;

6. The right to sufficient information about public policies to permit an informed decision;

7. The right to be represented by a candidate with at least a plurality of votes in a district

8. The right to vote in periodic elections

9. The right to cast one’s vote in an electoral system which has not been “gerrymandered” – that is, deliberately engineered as to favour one political party over another;

10. The right to equality of voting power – representation by population is one of the most fundamental democratic guarantees and, the notion of equality of voting power is fundamental to representation by population.

In his report ‘How We Vote’, David Eby states “No political party would be eligible to receive seats through a system’s proportional allocation method unless the party received at least 5% of the overall vote in the province or region.” How does this reflect the core values stated above? It contradicts the right to have one’s vote count, the right to have one’s vote count for the same as other valid votes cast in a district, and the right to be represented by a candidate with at least a plurality of votes in a district.

How about the right to cast one’s vote in an electoral system which has not been “gerrymandered”? From the beginning, this entire process has been gerrymandered beginning with the “not so neutral” arbiter attorney general, the very biased public consultation process, the flawed process of the Referendum Act 2018 with no regional or voter thresholds, the lack of information available to voters to make an informed decision (the right to sufficient information about public policies to make an informed decision), and a campaign period intertwined with a municipal election campaign to confuse voters and take advantage of voter fatigue.

Since Madam McLachlin’s decision in 1989, the Supreme Court of Canada has reinforced the importance of equality of voting power. Much emphasis has been placed on establishing electoral boundaries that provide this equality. How do you explain to the voters in a district that the MLA who received a plurality of votes is not eligible to take their seat in the legislature because some mathematical formula declares their party did not receive the right proportion of the popular vote? To David Eby and John Horgan – why have you put your own political goals ahead of the charter rights of the citizens of this province?

I’ll conclude by quoting Madam McLachlin: “If in giving substance to this right to vote, the Court interprets s.3 as granting to citizens the right to a certain degree of proportionate representation, then legislation efforts must be measured against this standard and if they fall short, be declared unconstitutional”

For those interested in reading the court decision, you can find it here

https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1989/1989canlii248/1989canlii248.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAEMTk4NAAAAAAB&offset=2152

Mike Morris is BC Liberal MLA for Prince George-Mackenzie.

Just Posted

Bulkley Valley Credit Union named Business of the Year

Awards gala sets new attendance record

Hazelton aces their way to gold at Grade 8 girls volleyball zones

Smithers schools grab silver and bronze at Prince Rupert Middle School tournament

William Griffin arrested in Houston homicide

RCMP have now arrested William Griffin, the man wanted in connection to… Continue reading

B.C. municipality wants ALC to reconsider their decision in regard to pipeline work camp

The ALC had rejected the construction of the Coastal GasLink work camp behind the Vanderhoof airport in October

Family of Terrace man killed in hit-and-run plead for tips, one year later

Cameron Kerr’s family says the driver and passengers tried to cover their tracks

Cold, stormy winter forecast across much of Canada, The Weather Network predicts

In British Columbia temperatures will be slightly above normal and precipitation will be just below normal

UPDATED: Vancouver Island’s Joe gets suspended sentence in Teddy the dog cruelty case

Melissa Tooshley expected in court on Thursday in same case

Nineteen boats carrying invasive mussels stopped at B.C. borders

Waters of Columbia-Shuswap still test mussel-free

Woman ‘horrified’ after being told to trek 200 kilometres home from Kamloops hospital

‘I can’t get from Kamloops back to 100 Mile House injured, confused… no shoes, no clothes whatsoever’

Canadian universities encourage exchange students in Hong Kong to head home

UBC said 11 of its 32 students completing programs in Hong Kong have already left

Midget no more: Sweeping division name changes coming to minor hockey in Canada

Alpha-numeric division names will be used for the 2020-2021 season and beyond

Duncan man gets suspended sentence in Teddy the dog cruelty trial

Joe also gets lifetime ban on owning animals

B.C. pushes for greater industry ‘transparency’ in gasoline pricing

Legislation responds to fuel price gap of up to 13 cents

B.C. woman ordered to return dog to ex-boyfriend for $2,000

After the two broke up, documents state, they agree to share custody of the dog, named Harlen

Most Read